
Cheers to 2025
Every New Year holds promise, as though it is any different from the turn of
I want to tell you something that took me embarrassingly long to learn. Not because the idea is complicated — it is not. But because it cuts against something deeply wired in us, something we are rarely honest enough to admit.
Here it is: the story you just heard is not the whole story.
Not because the person telling it is lying. Not necessarily. But because every human being who tells a story tells it from inside their own experience, in service of their own meaning, shaped by their own wounds. And that is not a character flaw. That is just how we are built.
The question is: what do you do with that knowledge? Because what you do with it will determine the quality of your relationships, the quality of your decisions, and honestly, a great deal about the kind of person you become.
The Three-Year-Old Who Knew Exactly What They Were Doing
Let me start with a small, inconvenient truth about human beings.
Watch a three-year-old who wants a biscuit before dinner. Watch how they assess the room. How they read which parent is softer today. How the tears arrive, precisely timed, at the exact moment they would be most effective. How the lip trembles on cue. How they glance sideways — just for a second — to check if the performance is landing.
A three-year-old. No formal education. No lived experience. No strategy course. And yet — pure, instinctive, emotional intelligence deployed in the service of a very specific agenda.
Now. If a child who still needs help tying their shoes can do that — consciously shape a narrative to serve their interest — what do you suppose a fully grown, decades-experienced adult is capable of?
I am not asking you to become cynical. I am asking you to become clear. Everyone knows what they are doing. Not always with malice. Not always with full conscious awareness. But with intent. Always with intent. And when they tell you their version of a conflict, a situation, or an event — they are telling it through the lens of that intent, whether they realise it or not.
The Interest Hidden in the Narrative
Here is something I have come to rely on almost like a compass: whenever someone brings me a story about a conflict or a grievance, I listen carefully — not just to what they are saying, but to what they need me to conclude.
Because the narrative and the interest are never far apart. Look closely at the fine print of any story someone tells you about another person and you will almost always find, cleverly tucked inside the language, a position they want you to validate, a judgement they want you to share, or a decision they want you to endorse.
That is not deception. That is human nature. We frame our stories around our experience of events — and our experience of events is shaped entirely by who we are, what we want, and what we fear. There is no neutral narrator. There never has been.
Which means the moment you hear one side and let your emotions steer your response, you have not taken a position. You have been assigned one.
And the relationship damage that follows from that assigned position — the friend you fell out with, the colleague you judged too quickly, the family member you wrote off based on what you heard at a dinner table on one particular night — that damage is often irreversible.
We All Judge. Every Single One of Us.
Let us be honest about something that polite company tends to avoid: every human being judges. All of us. Every day. Hundreds of times.
This is not a moral failing. It is a neurological fact. Anthropological research shows that the human brain makes micro-judgements at extraordinary speed — processing facial expressions, body language, tone, and context in under 200 milliseconds. Social neuroscientist Dr. John Bargh at Yale has demonstrated that we form first impressions so rapidly that by the time the conscious mind arrives at a “judgement,” the brain has often already decided and is simply constructing a rational explanation after the fact.
From an evolutionary perspective, this makes perfect sense. The brain that hesitated to assess a threat did not survive long enough to pass on its genes. Judgement — fast, instinctive, categorical — was a survival tool. We are, in the most literal sense, hardwired for it.
The problem, of course, is that the same mechanism designed to assess whether that movement in the grass was a predator is now being applied to whether your colleague’s silence in a meeting means they are undermining you.
The hardware is ancient. The social situations are modern. And the gap between the two is where damaged relationships are made.
Here is the additional complication: we do not just judge. We judge with confidence. The psychological phenomenon known as the Dunning-Kruger effect tells us that the less information we have, the more certain we tend to feel. Poor data produces bold conclusions. Which means the person most likely to take a firm position about someone else’s conflict is the one who knows the least about it.
Add emotion to that equation — because someone you care about is involved, because the story is compelling, because it confirms something you already believed about one of the parties — and you have the perfect conditions for a decision you will eventually regret.
Not Every Situation Requires Your Reaction
This one took me a while. I used to believe that silence in the face of something that felt wrong was a form of complicity. That wisdom required a verdict. That caring meant taking a side.
I have since learned something more useful: withholding judgement is not the same as having none. Staying out of a conflict is not indifference. It is often the most sophisticated response available.
Not every situation that lands in your lap came with an invitation for your involvement. Some situations need time, not input. Some conflicts resolve themselves when the people inside them are left enough oxygen to breathe. And some stories are brought to you not because the teller needs your judgement, but because they need to feel heard — and those are two very different things that call for two very different responses.

So How Do We Actually Prevent This?
Awareness is the beginning. But awareness without practice is just interesting information you forget by Tuesday. Here is what I have found genuinely useful — not as theory, but as daily discipline.
1 Pause Before You Position
When someone brings you their side of a story, your first job is not to conclude. It is to listen. Fully. And then to sit with what you heard before you do anything with it. The pause is not passivity. It is precision. Ask yourself: what do I actually know here, and what am I assuming? You will be surprised how often those two lists look very different.
2 Ask the Question That Changes Everything
Before you take a position, ask: ‘What would the other side say?’ Not rhetorically. Actually try to construct it. What is their experience of this situation? What do they want? What are they afraid of? What would make this story look completely different from where they are standing? You do not need to agree with that version. You just need to hold it alongside the one you have.
3 Separate the Person from the Narrative
The person telling you the story is not the story. They are a human being with a perspective shaped by everything that has ever happened to them. When you feel your emotions being activated by what you are hearing, that is exactly the moment to slow down. Strong emotion in response to second-hand information is almost always a signal that something in the story has touched your own history — not necessarily the truth of the situation.
4 Refuse to Be a Tiebreaker
One of the most damaging roles you can play in someone else’s conflict is the unofficial judge. Once you declare a side, you are no longer a friend or a colleague to both parties. You are a weapon in someone’s arsenal. You can care deeply about people in conflict without endorsing either version of events. In fact, that restraint is one of the highest expressions of relational maturity.
5 Protect the Absent Party
This is the one I remind myself of most often. The person being discussed is not in the room. They cannot correct distortions, provide context, or defend themselves. Which means your integrity — not theirs — is on the line. Extending the same basic assumption of humanity to the absent party as you do to the one in front of you is not naive. It is just fair.
6 Not Every Reaction Is Required
Train yourself to distinguish between situations that require your response and situations that are simply passing through your awareness. Not everything is a call to action. Some things are simply information. Receive them, file them honestly, and let life continue without your editorial comment. This single discipline will save more relationships than you can count.
The Discipline That Changes Everything
I want to be clear about something before I close. This is not an argument for permanent fence-sitting. It is not a suggestion that truth is entirely relative, or that there are no situations that call for a clear position. Some situations absolutely do. And some people, after due consideration of all available perspectives, deserve to be firmly called out.
But there is a world of difference between a considered position and a reactive one. Between a judgement grounded in full information and one built on a single narrated account, delivered by someone whose interest you have not yet interrogated.
The discipline of the second perspective is not about being slow. It is about being right. It is about protecting the relationships that matter from the damage of hasty conclusions. It is about ensuring that when you do take a position, it is yours — chosen, considered, earned — rather than one that was quietly handed to you inside someone else’s story.
The most important thing I have learned about people is this: they are almost always more complex than the version of them that arrives in someone else’s account. Honour that complexity. Not because it is comfortable, but because it is true.
Hear both sides. Sit with the discomfort of not knowing immediately. Let wisdom
move slower than emotion.
Your relationships will thank you for it.

Every New Year holds promise, as though it is any different from the turn of

A tipping point in business is the critical threshold where small, consistent efforts and favourable conditions trigger a much larger market response. It is the point where growth changes character.

A tipping point in business is the critical threshold where small, consistent efforts and favourable conditions trigger a much larger market response. It is the point where growth changes character.

A tipping point in business is the critical threshold where small, consistent efforts and favourable conditions trigger a much larger market response. It is the point where growth changes character.

A tipping point in business is the critical threshold where small, consistent efforts and favourable conditions trigger a much larger market response. It is the point where growth changes character.

A tipping point in business is the critical threshold where small, consistent efforts and favourable conditions trigger a much larger market response. It is the point where growth changes character.

A tipping point in business is the critical threshold where small, consistent efforts and favourable conditions trigger a much larger market response. It is the point where growth changes character.

A tipping point in business is the critical threshold where small, consistent efforts and favourable conditions trigger a much larger market response. It is the point where growth changes character.

A tipping point in business is the critical threshold where small, consistent efforts and favourable conditions trigger a much larger market response. It is the point where growth changes character.

A tipping point in business is the critical threshold where small, consistent efforts and favourable conditions trigger a much larger market response. It is the point where growth changes character.

A tipping point in business is the critical threshold where small, consistent efforts and favourable conditions trigger a much larger market response. It is the point where growth changes character.

When you stay loyal to a version of yourself that no longer exists—the one who was hurt, the one who failed, the one who was overlooked—you are still choosing. You are choosing to let one moment in time define the whole arc of your life. And that choice costs more than it keeps.

A tipping point in business is the critical threshold where small, consistent efforts and favourable conditions trigger a much larger market response. It is the point where growth changes character.

Culture is not static. It is not a problem you solve once and move on from. It is a living,
breathing, constantly evolving dynamic that reflects the collective experience of every
person in your organisation. The question is not whether your culture is changing. It is
whether it is changing in the direction you intend — or drifting somewhere you cannot
afford to go.
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Just write down some details about you and we will get back to you in a jiffy!