
Cheers to 2025
Every New Year holds promise, as though it is any different from the turn of
“When Confidence Curdles into Arrogance”
By Akin Akingbogun
The Man Who No Longer Had to Listen
The boardroom at Crescent Capital Partners on Victoria Island smelled of leather and ambition — the kind that had been earned, aged, and perhaps left out a little too long. Emeka Osei-Bello, Managing Director and Group CEO, sat at the head of a long mahogany table, his charcoal suit immaculate, his posture the kind that says, I built this. He had, in many ways, done exactly that.
Fourteen years ago, Emeka had joined the firm as a mid-level relationship manager, hungry and precise. His rise was the stuff of internal legend — the deal that saved Q2, the client he flew to Dubai to retain on a personal invite, the restructuring plan he submitted without being asked that eventually became policy. By the time he was named MD, the applause was genuine. He had earned it.
But that was seven years ago.
By the time this particular Monday morning board review arrived, something had quietly shifted. Adaeze, the firm’s Head of Strategy — brilliant, methodical, once Emeka’s most trusted sounding board — had requested fifteen minutes on the agenda. Her topic: ‘Market repositioning considerations for H2.’ Her tone in the email had been careful. Almost too careful.

She had barely gotten to her third slide when Emeka leaned back, glanced at his phone and said, with a half-smile that filled the room, “Adaeze, I appreciate your effort. But we’ve been doing this for fourteen years. I think we know our market.”
A few people around the table nodded. Some looked down at their notepads. Nobody said anything.
Adaeze gathered her slides. She thanked him. She sat down.
What the room did not know — what Emeka certainly did not know — was that Adaeze had been fielding quiet calls from three of their top clients over the past month. One had already begun migrating a portion of their portfolio to a newer, leaner firm. Another had casually mentioned a competitor’s name twice in their last review meeting. She had flagged this in a memo three weeks earlier. The memo sat, unread, in Emeka’s inbox.
Emeka was not a bad man. He was not even, strictly speaking, a bad leader. He was something more dangerous: a leader who had confused a long track record with permanent relevance. He had stopped learning, not because he was lazy, but because he no longer believed he needed to. The market had changed. His confidence had not. And the gap between those two things was widening, quietly, every quarter.
Nobody told him. Nobody dared.
THE CONCEPT
What Is The Hubris Trap?
“Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall.”
— Proverbs 16:18
The word hubris comes from ancient Greek — hybris — and in its original context, it referred not merely to arrogance, but to a specific kind of moral transgression: the dangerous overreach of a mortal who had forgotten their place in the order of things. In Greek tragedy, hubris was never rewarded. It was always, eventually, punished.
In modern leadership, the Hubris Trap is the slow and almost invisible journey from earned confidence to entrenched arrogance. It does not happen overnight. It does not announce itself. It arrives gradually, wrapped in the language of experience and authority.
The trap is typically set by success itself. A leader delivers results. The results generate respect. The respect generates authority. The authority, over time, generates a kind of insulation — from honest feedback, from uncomfortable data, from the voices of people lower in the hierarchy who see things the leader no longer sees. What begins as justifiable self-assurance quietly morphs into a closed system where the leader’s view of reality becomes the only view that matters.

The most dangerous aspect of the Hubris Trap is that it is often invisible to the person inside it. Leaders rarely see themselves as arrogant. They see themselves as decisive. Not dismissive — discerning. Not closed — focused. The reframing is internal and unconscious, and by the time it becomes visible to the outside world, the damage is already underway.
“Hubris, arrogance, is just one step ahead of loss of integrity. If you think you’re better than other people, you’ll start to believe the rules don’t apply to you.”
— Charles Koch, CEO, Koch Industries
A GLOBAL LESSON
Nokia: The Giant That Forgot It Could Fall
Perhaps no corporate story in the last three decades illustrates the Hubris Trap more vividly — or more expensively — than the fall of Nokia.
At its peak in the early 2000s, Nokia was the undisputed global king of mobile communications. The Finnish company held over 40% of the worldwide mobile phone market. Its phones were everywhere — from Lagos to London, from Mumbai to Minneapolis. In 2007, Nokia’s market capitalisation exceeded $150 billion. The brand was not just dominant. It was synonymous with the mobile phone itself.
Then Apple released the iPhone. And everything changed — except Nokia’s leadership.
Research by INSEAD later revealed that Nokia’s decline was driven not by a lack of resources, talent, or technological competence — but by “success breeding conservatism and hubris, which resulted in poor strategic decisions.” Inside Nokia’s headquarters in Espoo, Finland, the culture had grown toxic with internal politics and what researchers described as organisational fear. Senior leaders had become temperamental and unapproachable. Middle managers were terrified to deliver uncomfortable truths upward. The Symbian operating system was known internally to be falling behind — but no one felt safe enough to say so clearly.
Nokia had touchscreen prototypes. It had the engineering capacity to pivot. What it did not have was leadership humble enough to hear the warning signs — or a culture brave enough to sound them.
In September 2013, at a final press conference following Nokia’s acquisition by Microsoft for $7.2 billion — a fraction of its former value — the departing CEO, tearfully, said: “We didn’t do anything wrong, but somehow, we lost.”
In those words lives the tragedy of the Hubris Trap. The belief that you are doing everything right, even as the world signals, loudly and repeatedly, that the rules have changed.
“It’s not what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.”
— Mark Twain
WHAT TO WATCH FOR
Signs the Hubris Trap Is Already Closing
The Hubris Trap rarely arrives with a dramatic announcement. It leaves a quieter trail. Here is what it looks like from the inside — and from the outside.
For leaders — internal warning signs:
▸ You find yourself frequently dismissing new ideas before fully exploring them.
▸ Meetings feel most productive when people agree with your direction quickly.
▸ You cannot remember the last time someone junior told you something that genuinely surprised you.
▸ The phrase “I already know this” has become your internal reflex, not your conclusion.
▸ You have stopped being curious about what your competitors are doing — because you don’t believe they are a real threat.
For followers — what it looks like from your position:
▸ Honest conversations about risk or challenges are systematically avoided in team settings.
▸ Only certain voices — those that affirm the leader’s existing views — are welcomed into discussions.
▸ Good ideas that are not the leader’s own tend to go unacknowledged or quietly die.
▸ There is an invisible but well-understood cost to speaking uncomfortable truths.
▸ Strategic feedback rarely travels upward — because past experience has shown it rarely lands well.
THE WAY FORWARD
Escaping the Trap Before It Closes
Hubris is not inevitable for successful leaders. It is, however, predictable — which means it is also preventable. The antidote is not weakness or self-doubt. It is a disciplined, intentional, and consistent practice of intellectual humility.
Build feedback systems that actually work. The most common feature in organisations where the Hubris Trap has taken hold is the absence of genuine, psychologically safe challenge. Leaders must actively create channels where honest input can reach them — and must visibly reward those who deliver uncomfortable truths, not penalise them.
Distinguish between experience and expertise. Experience is historical. Expertise must be continuously renewed. A leader with fourteen years of experience in a market that has fundamentally shifted in the last two years does not automatically have fourteen years of relevant knowledge. Knowing the difference keeps you learning.
Audit your inner circle deliberately. If the people closest to you overwhelmingly confirm your thinking, that is a red flag, not a green light. Great leaders actively seek out advisors, peers, and team members who will challenge their assumptions — not protect their comfort.
Reconnect with the ground floor. The higher you rise in an organisation, the further removed you become from where the real signals live. Make it a deliberate practice to engage directly with customers, frontline staff, and junior talent. Not to perform accessibility — but to genuinely listen.
Treat feedback as information, not an attack. The moment a leader begins to experience honest challenge as a threat to their authority, the Hubris Trap has already begun to close. Feedback is data. Data is a gift.
FINAL THOUGHT
Emeka Osei-Bello is fictional. But he exists — in a thousand boardrooms, executive suites, and corner offices across Nigeria and the world. He is the leader who grew, succeeded, and somewhere along the way, stopped asking the questions that got him to the top.
The Hubris Trap does not target bad leaders. It targets successful ones. The very thing that got you here — your conviction, your decisiveness, your track record — can, if left unchecked, become the thing that eventually undoes you.
The world keeps moving. Markets keep shifting. People keep watching. The question that every leader must return to — not once, but perpetually — is this:
Am I still the kind of leader who is willing to be wrong?
That question is not a concession of weakness. It is the mark of a leader whose greatness has a chance of lasting.

Every New Year holds promise, as though it is any different from the turn of

In an era that increasingly demands hyper-specialization, Akin Akingbogun stands out as a refreshing anomaly. He is a man who refuses to be confined to a single box.

There is a particular kind of silence that falls on a man when the phone stops ringing, the proposals go unanswered, and the diary that once groaned under the weight of appointments sits quietly — almost mockingly — open. If you have ever been there, you know it.

Let me tell you something uncomfortable: the most generous person you know — the one who volunteers every weekend, donates quietly, never asks for anything in return — is probably getting something out of it. Not money. Maybe not even recognition. But something.

Adaeze had been awake since 4 a.m.
Not because she was anxious — though she was — but because this trip felt different. After eighteen months of follow-ups, phone calls, and PowerPoint presentations polished to a mirror shine, the deal was finally ready to close. An investor meeting in Abuja. A partnership that would change the trajectory of her small but gutsy consulting firm. She had triple-checked her flight, her documents, her outfit. She had prayed. She was ready.

When he told his father, Dare’s first response was a sigh. Then: “I told you to practice more. I told you months ago. You don’t listen. You never listen.”
There was no “I’m sorry, son.” No pause to let the boy simply feel the loss of the thing he wanted. Just a swift, seamless pivot to what Temi had done wrong — and, by extension, how Temi’s failure was evidence of Temi’s failure to take his father’s wisdom seriously.

I want to tell you something that took me embarrassingly long to learn. Not because the idea is complicated — it is not. But because it cuts against something deeply wired in us, something we are rarely honest enough to admit.

You are somewhere between forty and fifty-five. You looked in the mirror recently and had a thought you immediately dismissed. Maybe you googled something at 2am that you would never say out loud. Maybe you bought something expensive and impractical and told everyone it was an investment. Or maybe you just feel — quietly, persistently — like the life you built was supposed to feel better than this by now.

Anton Chekhov was a Russian physician and playwright — a man trained in the discipline of diagnosis before he became one of the most precise storytellers in the history of world literature. That combination of sensibilities matters, because the principle he articulated in the late nineteenth century was not merely a rule of dramatic craft. It was an observation about the nature of significance itself. About what it means for something to be present. About the relationship between introduction and consequence.

There is a prison that has no concrete walls, no iron bars, no guards posted at the gate. Nobody built it for you. Nobody sentenced you to it. And yet, for many people, it is the place they spend the better part of their lives — circling its perimeter, brushing their fingers against its invisible boundaries, and quietly retreating each time they feel the edge of something that might require more of them than they believe they can give.

Picture a hand holding sand. The tighter the grip, the faster the grains escape between the fingers. Ease the grip — open the palm, allow the hand to become a vessel rather than a vice — and the sand stays. This is one of the oldest paradoxes of leadership, and one of the least learned: that control, pursued too aggressively, produces the very loss of control it was designed to prevent.

There is a version of ambition that builds. And there is a version of ambition that consumes. From a distance — and especially from inside it — they look almost identical. Both are energetic. Both are forward-moving. Both speak the language of vision and possibility. The difference only becomes visible later, usually at the point of fracture, when what was built begins to come apart under the weight of what was promised.

There is a particular kind of organisational absurdity that most people who have ever worked in a company will recognise immediately. It is the policy that was clearly designed by someone who has never had to implement it. The restructuring that looked elegant on a slide deck and chaotic on the ground. The customer-facing process that was overhauled by a committee that has not spoken to a customer in years. The directive that arrives from above, fully formed and non-negotiable, that causes the people closest to the work to exchange a look — the kind of look that says, without words: they have no idea what we actually do here.

We have built an entire mythology around exhaustion. In boardrooms and business culture — perhaps nowhere more so than in the high-pressure, always-on professional culture many of us inhabit — busyness has become a currency. To be tired is to be serious. To be overwhelmed is to be important. To be burning out, quietly, is somehow proof that you are fully committed.
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Just write down some details about you and we will get back to you in a jiffy!
1 thought on “The Hubris Trap: When Confidence Curdles into Arrogance”
“Data is a gift”… I love this! Profound in the way it unlocks the message and the truth. Thank you.